F-2406Detected Sep 25, 15:41 UTC
Someone swapped my SIM without my permission. How fast can you block it?
Found in v3.4 · account-security v1.2 on account-security · Account & security
Model answer vs gold answer
12% of model-answer words appear in the gold answer
Model answer
support-assistant v3.4We can block an unauthorized SIM swap Unsupported: within 24 hours. Your line will be restored with a new SIM in Unsupported: 3 to 5 business days.
Gold answer
Human-verified · account-securityCall the fraud line or use My Harbor > Security > Report fraud; the line is blocked immediately. A replacement SIM can be issued the same day in any store with photo ID.
- claimFlagged by the judge as unsupported or contradicted
Retrieved context
bge-m3 · hybrid (BM25 + dense, RRF) · top 3 passed to the generator
1 of 3 retrieved chunks are relevant · gold passage at rank 3
- 1
SIM swap protection
In-store swaps · kb-account-005 · v2026.09
Not relevantIn-store SIM swaps require photo ID matching the account holder.
Similarity0.82 - 2
SIM swap protection
How SIM swap protection works · kb-account-005 · v2026.09
Not relevantYou can add a 24-hour hold on swaps in My Harbor.
Similarity0.80 - 3
Reporting fraud or suspicious activity
Blocking a line · kb-account-024 · v2026.09
RelevantReported lines are blocked immediately. Replacement SIMs are issued the same day in store.
Similarity0.77
Judge verdict
LLM judge · Claude Opus 5.5 · rubric v3
0.08
rubric score · pass threshold 0.70
The 24-hour figure refers to the optional swap hold, not blocking. The answer contradicts kb-account-024, which states immediate blocking and same-day replacement.
Diagnosis
Incorrect factual answers · SIM swap and fraud
Root cause
Two similar '24 hours' policies were conflated; the correct chunk ranked third.
Suggested fix
Boost kb-account-024 for fraud intents and add contrastive examples between swap hold and line blocking.
Playbook: incorrect factual answers
The answer contradicts the knowledge base, usually by misreading or conflating two policies.
Detection signals
- Answer correctness below 0.7 while faithfulness stays high
- Disagreement with gold on a key entity: plan, fee, date or zone
- Reviewer edits the fact but keeps the structure
Common fixes
- Check for a stale article version before changing the prompt
- Add a structured extraction step for fees and plan limits
- Add contrastive examples for similarly worded plans and zones
- Route high-stakes billing intents to verified templates
Activity
3 events · 0 comments
Relevant ·
Detected by support-assistant v3.4 run and labeled incorrect factual answers
Maya Collins ·
Severity raised to critical: security-sensitive intent
Maya Collins ·
Triaged and assigned to self