F-2405Detected Oct 6, 15:20 UTC
How long does it take to port my number from another operator?
Found in support-assistant v3.4 · release candidate on support-golden-v4 · Number porting
Model answer vs gold answer
21% of model-answer words appear in the gold answer
Model answer
support-assistant v3.4Number porting takes Unsupported: 3 to 5 business days once we receive your porting code.
Gold answer
Human-verified · support-golden-v4Once we receive a valid porting code, number transfers complete within 1 business day. Keep your old SIM active until your Harbor SIM shows signal.
- claimFlagged by the judge as unsupported or contradicted
Retrieved context
bge-m3 · hybrid (BM25 + dense, RRF) · top 3 passed to the generator
1 of 3 retrieved chunks are relevant · gold passage at rank 3
- 1
Porting out to another operator
Final bill · kb-porting-006 · v2026.09
Not relevantYour final bill from Harbor is issued within 5 business days of porting out.
Similarity0.78 - 2
Bringing your number to Harbor
Porting code · kb-porting-002 · v2026.09
Not relevantRequest a porting code from your current operator by text.
Similarity0.77 - 3
Bringing your number to Harbor
Timeline · kb-porting-002 · v2026.09
RelevantTransfers complete within 1 business day of receiving a valid code.
Similarity0.75
Judge verdict
LLM judge · Claude Opus 5.5 · rubric v3
0.15
rubric score · pass threshold 0.70
The timeline was taken from the port-out final-bill chunk. The correct port-in timeline (1 business day) is in chunk 3.
Diagnosis
Incorrect factual answers · Porting direction confusion
Root cause
Port-in and port-out articles share vocabulary; the port-out chunk ranks first.
Suggested fix
Add direction metadata (in/out) to porting articles and filter on the classified intent.
Playbook: incorrect factual answers
The answer contradicts the knowledge base, usually by misreading or conflating two policies.
Detection signals
- Answer correctness below 0.7 while faithfulness stays high
- Disagreement with gold on a key entity: plan, fee, date or zone
- Reviewer edits the fact but keeps the structure
Common fixes
- Check for a stale article version before changing the prompt
- Add a structured extraction step for fees and plan limits
- Add contrastive examples for similarly worded plans and zones
- Route high-stakes billing intents to verified templates
Activity
1 event · 0 comments
Relevant ·
Detected by support-assistant v3.4 run and labeled incorrect factual answers